![]() ![]() It will be based on natural ‘economy’ principles and indispensable primitives. A minimal theory, Chomsky argues, should dispense with everything but LF and PF. In defense of the notion that children can make strides learning language syntax, even if the sentences they are exposed to are bereft of meaning, Chomsky published "Aspects to the Theory of Syntax," in which he abandoned the notion of kernel sentences and identified the underlying constituents of sentences as deep structure. The initial state of the system is a Universal Grammar (UG): a super-recipe for concocting language-specific grammars. In recent years, with the advent of more sophisticated brands of computational modeling and more innovative approaches to the study of language acquisition, these criticisms have multiplied. For example, James Dale Williams, author of "The Teacher's Grammar Book," writes about a particular instance. Since their inception, universal grammar theories have been subjected to vocal and sustained criticism. Chomsky has ceded to criticisms of his theory in certain instances by modifying and enlarging the scope of the theory. ![]() Others fault his theory on the grounds that it neglects to account for environmental considerations, such as "motherese," a form of baby talk that influences a child's acquisition of grammar rules. ![]() Many of Chomsky's most vociferous opponents deride his assertions as unsubstantiated by empirical research. Chomsky’s idea of a brain wired with a mental template. Critics allege that Chomsky is guilty of over-generalization. Noam Chomsky has been a towering giant in the field of linguistics for many decades, famed for his well-known theory of universal grammar. Chomsky's theory of Universal Grammar is not universally admired. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |